Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of Inferential Analyses for Primary and Secondary Sex-Risk Outcome Measures (N = 128)

From: Feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive women-centered substance use intervention in Georgia: Sex risk outcomes

 

Treatment Condition

Time

Treatment Condition X Time

 

χ 2

p

χ 2

p

χ 2

p

Primary Outcomes

 Past-30-day frequency of unprotected sexual intercourse

1.64

0.2

31.21

<.001

1.47

0.48

Secondary Outcomes

 Unprotected sex at the last encounter: yes

0.03

0.87

2.78

0.25

0.79

0.68

 Condom Use Actions

0.02

0.89

2.71

0.26

3.76

0.15

 Safer-sex Actions

4.83

0.03

2.29

0.32

1.81

0.4

  1. Notes. N = 124 (128–4 with no main sex partner) at baseline; for secondary outcomes, N = 96 (128–16 with no main sex partner and 16 failed to return for assessment) at post-treatment assessment, and N = 86 (128–27 with no main sex partner and 15 failed to return for assessment) at 3-month follow-up assessment, while for the primary outcome, N = 92 (128–16 with no main sex partner and 16 failed to return for assessment plus an additional 4 participants who had a main sex partner who declined to answer these two questions) at post-treatment assessment and N = 74 (128–27 with no main sex partner and 15 failed to return for assessment plus an additional 12 participants who had a main sex partner who declined to answer these two questions). df = 1 for Treatment Condition, df = 2 for Session, and df = 2 for Treatment Condition X Session. Past-30-day number of times engaging in unprotected intercourse was a count variable assumed to follow a Poisson distribution, unprotected sex at the last encounter was a binary variable assumed to follow a binomial distribution, and condom self-efficacy and safe-sex self efficacy were continuous variables assumed to follow a normal distribution