Skip to main content

Table 3 Binary logistic regressions backward log likelihood method analyses for prediction of females’ and males’ HED and risk-use

From: Gender-specific predictors of at-risk adolescents’ hazardous alcohol use—a cohort study

 

Female HED

 

Male HED

 

Female risk-use

 

Male risk-use

 

self-rated

OR

p

CI

R N 2

OR

p

CI

R N 2

OR

p

CI

R N 2

OR

p

CI

R N 2

   

0.27

   

0.36

   

0.38

   

0.22

Age

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

Externalizing behavior

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

1.18

.003

1.02, 1.36

 

NA

NA

NA

 

Internalizing behavior

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

NA

NA

NA

 

SRD

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

Y-OQ®

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

Drinking friends (cat)

7.59

.003

1.30, 44.44

 

9.88

≤.001

2.01, 48.59

 

5.72

.004

1.21, 26.97

 

4.56

.003

1.20, 17.36

 

Delinquent friends

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

parent-rated

    

NA

       

NA

   

0.14

Externalizing behavior

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

1.09

.007

1.00, 1.19

 

Internalizing behavior

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

Y-OQ®

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

 
  1. HED Heavy Episodic Drinking assessed by AUDIT item 3, cut-off ≥ 2 p. AUDIT total scale cut-off for risk-use was ≥ 6 p. Categorical variable was dichotomized. Genders were analyzed in separate models, and parent-rated predictors were analyzed in separate models. Females n = 85, males n = 77. Cat = Categorical variable RN 2 = Nagelkerke pseudo R2. With correction for multiple testing using the α for significance was set to .01 and CI to 99%
Back to article page

Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

ISSN: 1747-597X