Skip to main content

The prevalence and pattern of cannabis use among patients attending a methadone treatment clinic in Nairobi, Kenya

Abstract

Background

Cannabis use during methadone treatment may negatively impact treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and pattern of cannabis use among patients attending a methadone treatment clinic in Nairobi, Kenya.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 874 patients on methadone therapy at a methadone maintenance treatment clinic in Nairobi, Kenya from December 2014 to November 2018. Data on sociodemographic characteristics and drug use patterns based on urine drug screens was collected from patient files. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for windows version 23.0.

Results

Point prevalence of cannabis use was 85.8% (95% CI, 83.3 – 88.0) at baseline and 62.7% (95% CI, 59.5 – 65.8) during follow-up. A pattern of polysubstance use was observed where opioids, cannabis and benzodiazepines were the most commonly used drugs. The mean age of the patients was 35.3 (SD 9.0) years with the majority being male, unemployed (76%), (51.4%) had reached primary level of education, and (48.5%) were divorced or separated. University education was associated with reduced risk for cannabis use OR = 0.1 (95% CI, 0.02-0.8, p = 0.031).

Conclusion

Cannabis use is prevalent among patients attending a methadone treatment clinic in Kenya, suggesting need for targeted interventions to address the problem of cannabis use during methadone treatment.

Background

Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit substance with a global prevalence of 4% among those aged 15-64 years and a trend of increasing use in recent years [1]. Cannabis use may lead to adverse health outcomes, including negative impact on neurodevelopment, increased risk of addiction and other substance use, cognitive impairment, poor education achievement [2, 3] and increased risk for psychiatric illness, including psychosis, depressive and anxiety disorders [4, 5]. Whilst in recent years cannabis products have become more potent, the majority of young people do not consider cannabis as harmful or leading to an increased risk of negative impact [1].

Opioid use is increasingly prevalent worldwide, with past-year prevalence of 1.2% globally with a trend of increasing use in Africa [1, 6]. In Kenya, prevalence of opioid use is 0.3% in the general population aged 15-65 years, and 1.6% among secondary school students [7, 8], while among inpatients with substance use disorders the prevalence is even higher [9]. Opioid use disorder refers to the problematic use of opioids that leads to significant distress and impairment, including physical, social and occupational dysfunction [10]. Treatment for opioid use disorder involves pharmacotherapy with opioid substitution treatment (OST) in conjunction with psychosocial interventions. Among the OST medications, methadone is the most commonly used and is effective in improving patient outcomes [11,12,13,14].

Prevalence of cannabis use in patients on methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is common and higher than prevalence in the general population [15]. A systematic review of 23 studies reported cannabis use prevalence of 11.2-78.6% among patients on MMT [15] while in another review of 41 studies in different OST programs, the median prevalence at baseline was 23%, median cumulative prevalence throughout treatment was 58% and median prevalence of frequent use at 18.5% [16]. There are geographical differences as shown in studies in different regions. For example, in Canada, the prevalence ranged from 23.1 to 59.7% [17,18,19]; in South Africa, prevalence of 87.3% at baseline and 73% during follow-up [20]; while two studies in China and Malaysia reported very low prevalence of 0.8 and 0.4%, respectively [21, 22]. The pattern of cannabis use exhibits a gender difference, with prevalence higher in males than in females [18, 19].

Cannabis use during MMT is associated with several negative effects, such as increased risk of dropping out of treatment, continued illicit opioid and other substance use, poor family relationships and psychosocial functioning, increased rate of incarceration, and physical and psychological health problems [15, 17, 18, 23,24,25]. Some studies, however, have also reported beneficial effects of cannabis use during MMT, including less opioid use, reduction in opioid withdrawal symptoms [26, 27], better retention in treatment [28] with some authors even suggesting a positive role for cannabis in opioid use disorder treatment [29, 30]. Whilst overall findings in two systematic reviews did not suggest cannabis use during OST to impact on the treatment outcomes [15, 16], sub-group analysis of data in one review showed that cannabis use during MMT was associated with poor retention for studies in United States of America with an opposite effect for studies in Israel [15].

MMT services are offered in Kenya and seven other countries in sub-Saharan Africa, meaning there is limited research on the effects of cannabis use by patients with opioid use disorder on MMT in the African context [31, 32]. Regionally, two Tanzanian studies have been conducted on MMT patients but, do not report on the prevalence of cannabis use in relation to outcomes [33, 34]. In Kenya, MMT is currently offered in eight government-funded clinics since December 2014 in regions in the country [35]. To the authors’ knowledge, no study has been done specifically addressing cannabis use among patients with opioid use disorder on methadone treatment. The objective of this study is to examine the prevalence and pattern of cannabis use and its association with sociodemographic characteristics among patients receiving MMT.

Methods

Study design

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study that involved abstraction of data from patient medical records at a methadone maintenance treatment clinic.

Study setting

The study was conducted at the MMT clinic in Mathari National Teaching & Referral Hospital (MNTRH) which was the first urban, publicly funded, and university-sponsored MMT clinic in Nairobi [35, 36]. In addition to MMT, other services at the clinic include treatment for comorbid disorders such as HIV, tuberculosis, sexually transmitted diseases and psychiatric illness. The eligibility criteria for MMT initiation are: individuals presenting with opioid use disorder, being above 18 years of age, and testing positive for opiates through urine drug screening. The patients attend the MMT clinic daily to receive their prescribed methadone dose which is administered as directly observed treatment.

Study population and sample size

The study population was patients in methadone treatment at MNTRH MMT clinic. The targeted sample was medical records of all those enrolled in the MMT clinic from December 2014 to November 2018 at MNTRH, which was a total of 984 patients. We excluded 11.2% (n = 110) of patients with missing bio data and drug screens. Figure 1 shows the flow chart and the final number of patients was (874).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of sample size and sampling procedure

Sampling procedure and data collection

The patients’ medical records at the MMT clinic had an outpatient number that helped in locating the files from the shelves. The outpatient number was a distinct number given to each patient upon enrollment into the MMT clinic. The standard procedure at the MMT clinic is that during enrolment to the treatment program and follow-up, patient information is routinely collected and stored in an electronic database and physical records. During the methadone maintenance therapy, random urine drug screens were performed every 3 months and the results were attached in the patient files. In this study, the data collected during the start of methadone treatment will be referred to as baseline data and data collected as participants continued treatment is referred to as data during the follow-up whereby the last UDS at the time of the study was used to assess current substance use.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were medical records for patients who (1) were on methadone treatment in the MMT clinic at MNTRH (2) were enrolled and initiated methadone therapy within the study period (December 2014 to November 2018) (3) had urine drug screen results at baseline and during follow-up. The exclusion criteria were medical records for patients that had missing information on biodata and urine drug screens records.

Data collection procedures

A data collection form was used to document data retrieved from the patient medical records at the records department in the MMT clinic. The data collected included date of enrollment, age, gender, education level, marital status, occupation and urine drug screen results. A pilot study was carried out to pretest the tool prior to the study to ensure validity and reliability. This was done using a sample of 20 patient files at the MMT clinic. The patient sociodemographic and urine drug screen results were retrieved from the selected files meeting the inclusion criteria then documented in the data collection forms. A copy of the data abstraction tool used is attached as supplementary material 1.

Data management

Data entry and analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for windows version 23.0. This study utilized univariate and bivariate analysis. In univariate analysis, demographic data was presented by frequency and proportions. Distribution of data was shown by central tendency measurements. In bivariate analysis, chi square and Fisher’s exact test were used to test the association between the repeat urine drug screen (RUDS) and each of the sociodemographic factors independently. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The results were presented using narratives, tables, charts, and graphs.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants

Table 1 is a summary of the sociodemographic characteristics of patients attending a methadone maintenance treatment clinic in Nairobi, Kenya. The mean age of the patients was 35.3 (SD 9.0) years, while the median age was 35.0 (IQR 29-41) years. The minimum age was 18 years while the maximum age was 81 years. Majority (88.2%) were males, 51.4% had primary education, and 76% were unemployed.

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of participants

Prevalence and pattern of cannabis use at baseline among study participants

The point prevalence of cannabis use at baseline among the participants was 85.8% (95% CI, 83.3 – 88.0). There was a pattern of polysubstance use whereby substances used were opioids, cannabis, benzodiazepines, cocaine, barbiturates and amphetamines. This is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Prevalence and pattern of cannabis use at baseline

Prevalence and pattern of cannabis use at repeat urine drug screen

The point prevalence of cannabis use among study participants during follow-up as shown by repeat urine drug screen was 62.7% (95% CI, 59.5 – 65.8). The repeat urine drug screens also revealed a pattern of polysubstance use. Table 3 shows the substances used were opioids, cannabis, benzodiazepines, cocaine and barbiturates.

Table 3 Prevalence and pattern of cannabis use at repeat urine drug screen

Comparison between cannabis use at baseline and repeat urine drug screen

Table 4 shows the distribution of cannabis use at baseline against cannabis use at repeat urine drug screen whereby 64.7% (n = 485) of those using cannabis at baseline continued to use cannabis while 50.8% (n = 63) of those not using cannabis at baseline had initiated cannabis use during follow-up. A McNemar’s test was done to compare cannabis use at baseline and at repeat urine drug screen and revealed a statistical difference (p < 0.001). Table 5 summarizes the pattern of cannabis use from baseline to follow-up. It shows 55.5% of participants continued cannabis use while 7.2% started cannabis use during follow-up.

Table 4 Comparison between cannabis use at baseline and repeat urine drug screen
Table 5 Pattern of cannabis use from baseline to follow-up

Sociodemographic factors and cannabis use at repeat urine drug screen

Table 6 shows the association between sociodemographic factors and cannabis use at repeat urine drug screen. University education was a significant factor associated with no cannabis use during follow-up. Sub-analysis was done to assess for any difference between cannabis use only and cannabis and other substance use compared with no cannabis use. There was no significant association between cannabis use and other sociodemographic factors. Tables 1 and 2 are attached as supplementary material 2.

Table 6 Sociodemographic factors and cannabis use at repeat urine drug screen (RUDS)

Discussion

This study aimed to determine the prevalence and pattern of cannabis use and associated sociodemographic characteristics among patients receiving MMT. The findings show a high prevalence of cannabis use among the patients both at baseline and at follow-up.

Prevalence and pattern of cannabis use

At intake, the point prevalence of cannabis use was 85.8% which is similar to a study in South Africa that reported a prevalence of 87.3% at baseline [20] but higher than patterns recorded at baseline among patients getting enrolled in MMT in studies done in Canada [17, 28]. A systematic review of cannabis use during pharmacological treatment for opioid use disorder showed a prevalence of 12-67% with a median of 23% [16]. While this finding may reflect the difference in pattern of substance use in the different regions, it can also be influenced by different ways in which cannabis use is assessed. For example, some studies rely on self-reporting while we used urine drug screen results to measure prevalence. Past research has shown a difference in sensitivity between self-report for substance use and drug toxicology results which is attributed to factors such as social desirability and stigma [37].

During follow-up, the point prevalence of cannabis use was 62.7% which was high, but lower than the point prevalence during intake. Prevalence of cannabis use during OST varies in different regions and is consistent with similar studies done in the rest of the world which have reported a rate of 46.9-73% [18,19,20, 26] with one systematic review reporting a cumulative prevalence of 58% with a range between 28 and 79% [16]. Continued use of cannabis during MMT is associated with negative effects such as high treatment attrition, increased risk for psychiatry comorbidity and increased use of other substances [15, 24] and can be used as a proxy measure for poor treatment outcomes [38]. This shows need for continued monitoring of cannabis use during MMT and providing relevant interventions to improve treatment outcomes for co-occurring cannabis use including psychosocial treatments such as cognitive behaviour therapy, motivational interviews and contingency management to improve treatment outcomes [38,39,40].

A pattern of polysubstance use in combination with cannabis was observed at baseline and during follow-up with the most common substances used being cannabis, benzodiazepines and opioids. This pattern of polysubstance use is common among patients on MMT and in studies done among the general population whereby cannabis use disorder is associated with lifetime use of all classes of drugs [40, 41]. This polysubstance use may arise for several reasons, including genetic and environmental factors, use of specific combinations of substances to achieve synergistic effects [24] or self-medication for withdrawal or negative emotional symptoms [38]. This highlights the need to incorporate treatment for other substance use with OST for optimum care, which can include pharmacological treatment where applicable, psychological treatment and social support [42].

Majority of those using cannabis at follow-up were using cannabis at baseline. However, half of participants with no cannabis use at baseline were observed to have initiated use during follow-up. A similar pattern of initiating substance use during MMT follow-up has been reported in a study in South Africa in which alcohol use was found to increase in the initial period following MMT enrolment [43]. This could imply that some patients use may cannabis use to manage withdrawal symptoms as reported in some studies [26, 27] although this finding has been disputed in another study [44]. However, further research is needed to better explain this phenomenon.

Association of sociodemographic characteristics and cannabis use

In this study, level of education was the only sociodemographic factor that was significantly associated with cannabis use whereby, university education was associated with reduced odds of using cannabis during follow-up. This could be due to the observation of low education attainment among participants with the majority (51%) having primary education, a finding similar to what has been observed in regional studies in Tanzania [33, 34] and other parts of the world [19, 45]. This may reflect the poor education attainment associated with cannabis use [46, 47]. Higher education may positively influence substance use behaviour through factors such as enhanced self-efficacy [48]. Alternatively, the association between cannabis use and poor educational achievement could be due to a reverse causal association whereby poor educational achievement leads to increased cannabis use [46].

Limitations

The findings in this study are based on retrospective abstraction of data from medical records of patients hence may have missed data that could not be retrieved from the patients’ records. Second, most of the data recorded in the patients’ records at start of treatment were based on self-report which is subject to bias such as recall and reporting bias due to social desirability. Third, substance use during follow-up was based on the last urinary drug screen in the patient’s medical records, which may not be accurate since it left out other substances not assessed in the drug screen, such as alcohol, nicotine and khat. Additionally, this study assessed cannabis use based on urine drug screens, which has variable length on time when positive compared to self-report and hence may not be a direct reflection of cannabis use in the study population. Fourth, our study is based on bivariate analysis of data which may not have been adequate to determine a statistical association. Fifth, this study was based on analysis of data from one methadone clinic hence these findings may not be generalizable to the other MMT clinics in other regions.

Conclusion

There is a high point prevalence of cannabis use during treatment intake and follow-up among individuals with opioid use disorder on methadone treatment. In addition, there is a pattern of polysubstance use. University education reduced the odds of using cannabis. These findings have important clinical and research implications in providing guidance on what to include in MMT programs. Continued screening and monitoring of cannabis use among patients on MMT is important in identifying those using cannabis and then offering appropriate and targeted interventions to improve treatment outcomes. In addition, based on the pattern of polysubstance use observed among patients on methadone treatment, there is need to have interventions that target other substance use as individuals continue with the MMT.

To build upon our study findings, we recommend further studies to assess cannabis use among patients on MMT in other regions for comparison of findings and to allow generalization. These findings may be used to inform policies on how to improve treatment outcomes among persons with opioid use disorder on methadone treatment in Kenya.

Availability of data and materials

Data sets used and analyzed in this current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

IQR:

Interquartile range

MMT:

Methadone maintenance treatment

MNTRH:

Mathari National Teaching and Referral Hospital

OR:

Odds ratio

OST:

Opioid substitution therapy

RUDS:

Repeat Urine Drug Screen

SD:

Standard deviation

SPSS:

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

UDS:

Urine drug screen

References

  1. United Nations office on drug and Crime (UNODC). World Drug Report 2020: Drug use and health consequences. Vienna: United Nations publication, Sales No. E.20.XI.6; 2020.

  2. Collins C. Adverse health effects of marijuana use. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(9):879.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoch E, Bonnetn U, Thomasius R, Ganzer F, Havemann-Reinecke U, Preuss UW. Risks associated with the non-medicinal use of cannabis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Apr;112(16):271–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Degenhardt L, Ferrari AJ, Calabria B, Hall WD, Norman RE, McGrath J, et al. The global epidemiology and contribution of cannabis use and dependence to the global burden of disease: results from the GBD 2010 study. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76635.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hosseini S, Oremus M. The effect of age of initiation of Cannabis use on psychosis, depression, and anxiety among youth under 25 years. Can J Psychiatr. 2019 May;64(5):304–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurth AE, Cherutich P, Conover R, Chhun N, Bruce RD, Lambdin BH. The opioid epidemic in Africa and its impact. Curr Addict Rep. 2018;5(4):428–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. National Authority for the Campaign Againist Alcohol and Drug Abuse (NACADA). National Survey on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Among Secondary School; 2016. p. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. National Authority for the campaign Againist alcohol and drug abuse (NACADA). Rapid situation assessment of drugs and substance abuse in Kenya. NACADA Rep. 2017;1(1):1–119 Available from: http://nacada.go.ke/?page_id=387#.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kiburi SK, Molebatsi K, Obondo A, Kuria MW. Adverse childhood experiences among patients with substance use disorders at a referral psychiatric hospital in Kenya. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Razzaghi EM. A warm welcome to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition? Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2014;8:1–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bart G. Maintenance medication for opiate addiction: the foundation of recovery. J Addict Dis. 2012;31(3):207–25. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/10550887.2012.694598.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Larney S, Peacock A, Leung J, Colledge S. Global, regional, and country-level coverage of interventions to prevent and manage HIV and hepatitis C among people who inject drugs: A systematic review; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Degenhardt L, Grebely J, Stone J, Hickman M, Vickerman P, Marshall BDL, et al. eries Drug Use 1 Global patterns of opioid use and dependence : harms to populations, interventions , and future action. Lancet. 2019;394(10208):1560–79. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32229-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ayanga D, Shorter D, Kosten TR. Update on pharmacotherapy for treatment of opioid use disorder. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17(17):2307–18. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/14656566.2016.1244529.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McBrien H, Luo C, Sanger N, Zielinski L, Bhatt M, Zhu XM, et al. Cannabis use during methadone maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ Open. 2019. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.9778/cmajo.20190026.

  16. Lake S, St. Pierre M. The relationship between cannabis use and patient outcomes in medication-based treatment of opioid use disorder: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020;82:101939. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101939.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Franklyn AM, Eibl JK, Gauthier GJ, Marsh DC. The impact of cannabis use on patients enrolled in opioid agonist therapy in Ontario, Canada. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zielinski L, Bhatt M, Sanger N, Plater C, Worster A, Varenbut M, et al. Association between cannabis use and methadone maintenance treatment outcomes: an investigation into sex differences. Biol Sex Differ. 2017;8(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bawor M, Dennis BB, Varenbut M, Daiter J, Marsh DC, Plater C, et al. Sex differences in substance use, health, and social functioning among opioid users receiving methadone treatment: a multicenter cohort study. Biol Sex Differ. 2015;6(1):1–11. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13293-015-0038-6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morgan N, Daniels W, Subramaney U. A prospective observational study of heroin users in Johannesburg , South Africa : Assessing psychiatric comorbidities and treatment outcomes. Compr Psychiatry. 2019;95:152137. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kidorf M, Disney ER, King VL, Neufeld K, Beilenson PL, Brooner RK. Prevalence of psychiatric and substance use disorders in opioid abusers in a community syringe exchange program. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;74:115–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Teoh J, Fei B, Yee A, Hussain M, Habil B. Psychiatric comorbidity among patients on methadone maintenance therapy and its influence on quality of life. Am J Addict. 2016;25:49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Epstein DH, Preston KL, Epstein DH. Does Cannabis use predict poor outcome for heroin-dependent patients on maintenance treatment? A review of past findings, and more evidence against. Addictions. 1993;98(3):269–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shams I, Sanger N, Bhatt M, Rosic T, Luo C, Shahid H, et al. The association between health conditions and cannabis use in patients with opioid use disorder receiving methadone maintenance treatment. BJPsych Open. 2019;5(6):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bagra I, Krishnan V, Rao R, Agrawal A. Does Cannabis use influence opioid outcomes and quality of life among buprenorphine maintained patients? A cross-sectional, Comparative Study. J Addict Med. 2018;12(4):315–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scavone JL, Sterling RC, Weinstein SP, Van Bockstaele EJ. Impact of cannabis use during stabilization on methadone maintenance treatment. Am J Addict. 2013;22(4):344–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kral AH, Wenger L, Novak SP, Chu D, Corsi KF, Coffa D, et al. Is cannabis use associated with less opioid use among people who inject drugs? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;153:236–41. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Socías ME, Wood E, Lake S, Nolan S, Fairbairn N, Hayashi K, et al. High-intensity cannabis use is associated with retention in opioid agonist treatment: a longitudinal analysis. Addiction. 2018;113(12):2250–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiese B, Wilson-Poe AR. Emerging evidence for cannabis’ role in opioid use disorder. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2018;3(1):179–89.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Suzuki J, Weiss RD. Cannabinoids for the treatment of opioid use disorder: where is the evidence? J Addict Med. 2021;15(2):91–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Scheibe A, Marks M, Shelly S, Gerardy T, Domingo AK, Hugo J. Developing an advocacy agenda for increasing access to opioid substitution therapy as part of comprehensive services for people who use drugs in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2018;108(10):800–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. International Harm Reduction. Global State of Harm Reduction: 2019 updates. Harm Reduct Int. 2019:1–63 Available from: https://www.hri.global/global-state-of-harm-reduction-2019.

  33. Lambdin BH, Masao F, Chang O, Kaduri P, Mbwambo J, Magimba A, et al. Methadone treatment for HIV prevention- feasibility, retention, and predictors of attrition in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(5):735–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ubuguyu M, Tran OC, Bruce RD, Masao F, Nyandindi C, Sabuni N, et al. Improvements in health-related quality of life among methadone maintenance clients in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;30:74–81. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Guise A, Ndimbii J, Igonya EK, Owiti F, Strathdee SA, Rhodes T. Integrated and differentiated methadone and HIV care for people who use drugs: a qualitative study in Kenya with implications for implementation science. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34(2):110–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rhodes T, Guise A, Ndimbii J, Strathdee S, Ngugi E, Platt L, et al. Is the promise of methadone Kenya’s solution to managing HIV and addiction? A mixed-method mathematical modelling and qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e007198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Khalili P, Nadimi AE, Baradaran HR, Janani L, Rahimi-Movaghar A, Rajabi Z, et al. Validity of self-reported substance use: research setting versus primary health care setting. Subst Abus Treat Prev Policy. 2021;16(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. White WL, Campbell MD, Spencer RD, Hoffman HA, Crissman B, DuPont RL. Patterns of abstinence or continued drug use among methadone maintenance patients and their relation to treatment retention. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014;46(2):114–22. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/02791072.2014.901587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoch E, Preuss W, Ferri M. Digital interventions for problematic Cannabis users in non-clinical Settings : findings from a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112:271–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0271.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Le Foll B, Sabioni P. Psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for the treatment of cannabis use disorder. F1000Research. 2018;7(0):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Heikman PK, Muhonen LH, Ojanperä IA. Polydrug abuse among opioid maintenance treatment patients is related to inadequate dose of maintenance treatment medicine. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Carlsen SL, Lunde L. Opioid and Polydrug use among patients in opioid maintenance treatment. Subst Abus Rehabil. 2020;11:9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Morgan N, Daniels W, Subramaney U. An inverse relationship between alcohol and heroin use in heroin users post Detoxi fi cation. Subst Abus Rehabil. 2020;11:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Epstein AJ, Barry CL, Fiellin DA, Busch SH. Patient valuation of different approaches to mental health and substance use disorder treatment. Value Health. 2015;18(3):A277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mayet A, Lions C, Roux P, Mora M, Maradan G, Morel A, et al. Variations in Cannabis use level and correlates in opiate-users on methadone maintenance treatment: a French prospective study. J Subst Abus Treat. 2015;58:100–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jsat.2015.06.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Horwood LJ, Fergusson DM, Hayatbakhsh MR, Najman JM, Coffey C, Patton GC, et al. Cannabis use and educational achievement: findings from three Australasian cohort studies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;110(3):247–53. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.03.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Thompson K, Leadbeater B, Ames M, Merrin GJ. Associations between marijuana use trajectories and educational and occupational success in young adulthood. Prev Sci. 2019;20(2):257–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Moradinazar M, Farnia V, Alikhani M, Karyani AK, Rezaei S, Rezaeian S, et al. Factors related to relapse in patients with substance-related disorders under methadone maintenance therapy: decision tree enalysis. Oman Med J. 2020;35(1):e89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Wycliffe Ayieko for his input in statistical analysis of the data.

Funding

The authors report no external funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EWN was involved in study conception, design, acquisition and interpretation of data and drafting and revising the manuscript. SKK was involved in interpretation of data, drafting and revising of the manuscript. FRO and RN were involved in design, interpretation of data and revising the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Wambui Ngarachu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval to conduct this study from Scientific Ethics and Research Committee of University of Nairobi, Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH-UON ERC) was obtained before conducting the study (approval number P313/04/2019). In addition, permission was sought to carry out the study from the management of MNTRH and the MMT clinic. The ethics approval letter is attached in supplementary material 2.

This was a retrospective study, involving data abstraction from patient records, with no direct interviews to patient, hence no consent to participate was required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure 1.

Data abstraction tool.

Additional file 2: Table 1.

Sociodemographic Factors and Cannabis use at Repeat Urine Drug Screen (Cannabis use only). Table 2. Sociodemographic Factors and Cannabis use at Repeat Urine Drug Screen (Cannabis use with other substances). Figure 2. Ethical approval document.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ngarachu, E.W., Kiburi, S.K., Owiti, F.R. et al. The prevalence and pattern of cannabis use among patients attending a methadone treatment clinic in Nairobi, Kenya. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 17, 12 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13011-022-00437-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13011-022-00437-7

Keywords

  • Pattern of cannabis use
  • Prevalence of cannabis use
  • Opioid use disorder
  • Methadone maintenance clinic
  • Kenya